Should Taxpayers Fund Private Schools?

I learn, from the radio, and The Journal that the Irish minister for education is to look at what, exactly, fee-paying schools do with the fees they are paid. The “potential extent and nature of Exchequer investment” in fee-paying schools will be under review, the Department told The Journal.


There has been a bit of grumbling in the Irish media recently about private schools that are also in receipt of tax-payer’s money.  Some people contend that if a parent wants to send their child/ren to a fee-paying school, then they should foot the bill for all the associated costs.


I disagree. According to our constitution, all children are entitled to an education. Article 42.2 states:


The State shall provide for free primary education and shall endeavour to supplement and give reasonable aid to private and corporate educational initiative,


(In the Sinnott case, the Supreme Court decided that the right to free primary education ends at age 18).


The State has a duty to provide a minimum standard of education, but if a parent desires more for their child and they are willing to find the money to pay for it, then I think fair play to them.  All they are doing is ‘topping up’ the amount provided by the state in order to ensure that their children are educated to a higher than ‘minimum’ standard.  The children of the fee-paying schools are entitled to the minimum standard at the tax-payer’s expense, just the same as the children who attend non-fee-paying schools are entitled to that minimum.


As I have written before the standard of Irish education is not very high. If you have 30 children in a room there isn’t much you can hope to teach any of them.  In many fee-paying schools, the fees go to provide extra teachers to bring down the pupil:teacher ratio. This gives the children in these classes a better chance of reaching their potential. Which, as far as I’m concerned, is what education’s all about.




Published by

Hazel Katherine Larkin


2 thoughts on “Should Taxpayers Fund Private Schools?”

  1. Don’t agree Hazel, sorry.

    “All they are doing is ‘topping up’ the amount provided by the state in order to ensure that their children are educated to a higher than ‘minimum’ standard.”
    To me, topping up is taking the standard offering and adding to it. That is not what is happening here. Instead schools, some with very restrictive registration criteria, are getting €100 million from the State, plus the same again in fees to provide an exclusive education to a small number.

    To put this in context, the cost of all SNAs in 2011 was €348 million. So you can see that this is not an insubstantial sum that is being paid out.

    I have no problems with parents sending their children to a private school if they wish to. But if they decide not to avail of the free schooling provided by the State, I’m not sure why the private school they pay for should be subsidised.

    I recognise that some private schools serve a minority ethos and I think this does need to be allowed for and supported. But the notion that many teachers in private schools should be paid for automatically needs to be questioned just as much as the practicalities of mainstreaming kids with special needs, or the need to reduce class sizes already has (apparently) been,


Please feel free to share your thoughts and comments!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.